Research Bibliography
Ascher, C. and Fruchter,
N. (2001). “Teacher quality and student performance in New York City’s low-performing schools.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6, 199-214.
Barley, Z., Lauer, P. A., Arens, S. A., Apthorp, H. S., Englert, K. S., Snow, D., and Akiba, M. (2002). Helping at-risk students meet standards: A synthesis of evidence-based classroom practices. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Barr,
R.D., and Parrett, W.H. (2003). Saving
our students, saving our schools: 50 proven strategies for revitalizing at-risk
students and low-performing schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Barr,
R.D., and Parrett, W.H. (2007). The kids
left behind – Catching up the underachieving children of poverty: A synthesis
of research on what works in high-performing, high-poverty schools. Bloomington,
IN: Solution Tree.
Barthe, P., Haycock, K., Jackson, H., Mora, K., Ruiz, P., Robinson, S. and Wilkins, A. (Eds.). (1999). Dispelling the myth: High poverty schools exceeding expectations. Washington DC: Education Trust.
Barton, P. E. (2003, October). Parsing the achievement gap: Baselines for tracking progress. ETS Policy Information Report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service (ETS)
Bernhardt, V. (1998). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide
improvement. 2nd Ed. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education
Bryk A. and Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools. New York: Sage Publishing
Burkett, H. (2006). Six don’ts of school improvement…and Their Solutions. Remarks from On the Right Track 4, an annual school improvement symposium
for California school practitioners. Naperville, IL: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement, Learning Points Associates.
Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.centerforcsri.org/index.php?option=com_contentandtask=viewandid=325andItemid=5
Casey, S. C. (2000). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high-performing,
high-poverty schools. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
Cawelti, G. and Protheroe, N. (2003). Supporting school improvement: Lessons from districts successfully meeting the challenge. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
Chadwick, K.G. (2004).
Improving schools through community engagement:
A practical guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Charles A. Dana Center. (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty, urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
Clark R. (2002). Ten hypotheses
about what predicts student achievement for African American students and all other students:
What the research shows. In W. R. Allen, M.B. Spencer, and C. O’Conner (Eds), African American education: Race, community, inequality, and achievement: A Tribute to Edgar G. Epps. Oxford, UK:
Elsevier Science.
Corcoran
T. and Lawrence N. (2003), Changing district culture and capacity: The impact of the
Merck Institute for Science Education Partnership, Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University
of Pennsylvania.
David, J.L. and Shields, P.M. (2001). When Theory Hits Reality: Standards-Based Reform in Urban Districts. Menlo Park,
CA: SRI International. http://www.sri.com/policy/cep/edreform/pew.html
Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure
for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
Elmore, R.F. and
City, E. A. (2007). “The road to school improvement.” Harvard Education Letter, 23(3):1-3.
Erickson, H. L. (1998) Concept based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond
the facts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
Fullan, M., Bertani, A., and Quinn, J. (2004). “New lessons for districtwide reform: Effective leadership for change at the district level has 10 crucial components”. Educational
Leadership, 61(7):42-46.
Goodwin, B. (2000, May). Raising the achievement of low-performing students [Policy Brief]. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent
Research for Education and Learning. Retrieved from www.mcrel.org/topics/policyBrief.asp.
Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., and Williamson, S. (1998). Does money matter for minority and disadvantaged students? Assessing the new
empirical evidence. In W.J. Fowler., Jr. (Ed.), Developments in school finance, 1997 (pp 15-30). Washington,
DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Guskey, T. R. (
2000) Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Haberman, M. (1991). “Pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching.” Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290-294.
Haycock, K. (2001, March). “Closing the achievement gap: Helping all students achieve.” Educational Leadership, 58(60),
6-11.
Haycock, K. (2004). Statement on the Harvard Civil Rights Project and Urban Institute Report on high school graduation rates
and NCLB. Retrieved from www2.edtrust.org/EDTrust/Press+Room/Harvard+project.htm.
Henderson, A. T, and Mapp, K.L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections
on student achievement – Annual synthesis 2002. Austin, TX: National Center
for Family and Community Connections with Schools, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Housman, N. G., and Martinez, M.R. (April, 2001). A brief for practitioners on turning around low-performing schools: Implications
at the school, district, and state level. The National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform.
Iowa Association of School Boards. (2000). “IASB’s Lighthouse study: School
boards and student achievement.” Iowa School Board Compass, 5(2). Retrieved
from www.ia-sb.org/studentachievement/Tecnicalreport2.pdf.
Jagers, R.J., and
Carroll, G. (2002). “Issues in educating African American children and
youth. In S. Stringfield and D. Land (Eds.), Educating
at-risk students [Yearbook of national Society for the Study of Education, vol. 101, part 2] (pp 49-65). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Jerald, C.D. (2001). Dispelling the myth revisited:
Preliminary findings from a nationwide analysis of “high-flying” schools [Report]. Washington, D.C.: Education
Trust.
Jerald, C. D. (2005). More than maintenance:
Sustaining improvement efforts over the long run. Naperville, IL: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement, Learning Points
Associates. Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.centerforcsri.org/index.php?option=com_contentandtask=viewandid=365andItemid=97
Kannapel, P. J. and Clements, S. K. (2005). Inside the black box of high-performing, high-poverty schools: A report from
the Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence. Lexington, KY: Prichard Committee
for Academic Excellence.
Kendall, J. S. (2001). A technical guide for revising or developing standards and benchmarks. Aurora, CO:
Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Kercheval, A. and Newbill, S.L. (2002). A case study of key effective practices in Ohio’s improved school districts.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana Center for Evaluation.
Leone, P. A., Director, (2004). Review of factors and practices associated with school performance in Virgina. The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission of the Virginia General Assembly to the Governor.
Lezotte, L. and McKee, K. M. (2002). Assembly required: A continuous school
improvement system. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products, Ltd.
Marzano, R. J. and
Kendall, J. S. (1996) A comprehensive guide to designing standards-based districts,
schools, and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Iowa Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Marzano, R. J.,
Waters, T., and McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research
to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Massell, D. (2000). The district's role in building capacity: Four strategies, 2000, Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
McGee, G.W. (2004). “Closing the achievement gap: Lessons from Illinois’ Golden Spike high-poverty, high-performing schools, Journal of education for students placed
at risk, 9(2), 97-125.
McLaughlin, M. and Talbert J. (2003). Reforming districts: How districts support
school reform a research report. Seattle, WA: Center of Study for Teaching and Policy.
McLaughlin, M.W., Talbert, J.E., Gilbert, S., Hightower, A.M., Husbands, J.L., Marsh, J.A., and Young, V.M. (2004). Districts as change agents: levers for system-wide instructional improvement. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Paper Presentation at the Annual
Meeting of the AERA. San Diego, CA
Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning. (2005). Final Report: High Needs
Schools – What does it take to beat the odds? [REL deliverable 2005-08]. Aurora, CO: Author.
Miles, K.H. and Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources:
Some lessons from high-performing schools. Educational evaluation and policy analysis,
22, 1-26.
Nathan, J. and Johnson,
N. (2000, December). What should we do? A
practical guide to assessment and accountability in schools. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.
Newmann, F. M., Lopez, G., and Bryk, A.S. (1998). The quality of intellectual work in Chicago schools: A baseline report.
Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, retrieved from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/publications.php?pub_id=50.
Newmann, F.M., Smith, B, Allensworth, E., and Bryk, A. (2001). School instructional coherence: Benefits and challenges. Chicago, IL: Consortium on
Chicago School Research.
Odden, A. R. and
Archibald, S. (2001). Reallocating resources: How to boost student achievement without asking for more. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Odden, A., Archibald,
S., Fermanich, M., and Gross, B. (2003, Winter). “Defining school-level
expenditure structures that reflect educational strategies.” Journal of Educational
Finance, 28(3), 323-356.
Padron, Y.N., Waxman, H.C., and Rivera, H.H., (2002, August), Educating Hispanic students: Effective instructional practice (Practitioner Brief #5). Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for
Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence.
Pan, D., Rudo, Z.H., Schneider, C.L., and Smith-Hansen, L. (2003). Examination of resource allocation in education: Connecting spending to student
performance. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational
Development Laboratory.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2006). Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction, and assessment:
What contemporary research and theory suggests. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy. Retrieved
March 2007 from http://skillscommission.org/commissioned.htm
Public Impact for the Center on Innovation & Improvement (2007). School Turnarounds: A Review of the Cross-Sector
Evidence on Dramatic Organizational Improvement. Academic Development Institute.
Quigley, M. A. and Inos, R. H. “Research review for inclusive practices.” Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
Hawaii: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
Resnick, L.B. (1999, June 16) Making America Smarter, Education Week Century Series. 18(40) 38-40. Retrieved from web site: http:///www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/40resnick.h18
Reeves, D. B. (2004) Making standards work: How to implement standards-based
assessments in the classroom, school, and district. Englewood,CO: Advanced Learning Press.
Reynolds, D., Hopkins,
D., Potter, D., and Chapman, C. (2002). School improvement for schools facing challenging
circumstances: A review of research and practice. School Leadership and Management,
22(3), 243-256.
Richardson, J. (2003, February). “The secrets of ‘can-do’ schools:
Louisiana team uncovers traits of high-poverty, high-performing schools. Results.
Retrieved from www.nsdc.org/library/publications/results.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., and Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., and Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher
evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation, 11(1), 57-67.
Shannon, G. S., and Bylsma, P. (2004). Characteristics of improved school districts:
Themes from research. Olympia, WA: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved March
2007, from http://www.k12.wa.us/research/pubdocs/DistrictImprovementReport.pdf
Sa,
S. and Thompson, S. (2005). Norfolk, VA:
Creating a High-Performance Culture, Strategies for school system leaders and
district-level change, Washington, D.C.: Panasonic Foundation, 11 (1): 1-17.
Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., and Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement.
Washington DC: MDRC for the Council of the Great City Schools. http://www.mdrc.org/publications/47/full.pdf.
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, (2005). Working systemically to increase student achievement:
A facilitator’s handbook. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved March
2007 from http://www.sedl.org/ws/tools.html or refer to http://www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/change103.html
Supovitz, J.A. and Taylor, B.S. (2003). The impact of standards-based reform in Duval
County, Florida: 1999-2002. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement, Learning Points Associates, (2006), Seven Actions that Improve School District Performance. Naperville, IL: Author. Retrieved March
2007 from http://www.centerforcsri.org/index.php?option=com_contentandtask=viewandid=394andItemid=5
The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement, Learning Points Associates, (2005), The role of principal leadership in improving student achievement. Naperville, IL: Author. Retrieved
March 2007 from http://www.centerforcsri.org/index.php?option=com_contentandtask=viewandid=145andItemid=5
Togneri, W. and Anderson, S.E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What district can do to improve instruction and achievement
in all schools. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance. Retrieved March 2007 from http://learningfirst.org/publications/districts/.
Trybus, M.A. “The challenge and hope of scientifically based research.”
Improving student achievement and teacher effectiveness through scientifically based practices, NCREL Viewpoints, Volume 11.
Viadero, D. (2004, January 21). “Achievement-gap study emphasizes better use of data.” Education Week, 23(19), 9.
Walberg, H.J. (ed) (2007).
Restructuring and Substantial School Improvement.Lincoln, IL: Center on
Innovation & Improvement.
Waters, J. T. and Marzano, R. J. (2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on
student achievement. A working paper. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Wheelan, S. A., and Kesselring, J. (2005). Link between faculty group development and elementary student
performance on standardized tests. Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 323–330.
Zavadsky, H. (2006). How NCLB drives success in urban
schools. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 69-73.
